Pseudo-Secularism

Hindu dharma is implicitly at odds with monotheistic intolerance. What is happening in India is a new historical awakening... Indian intellectuals, who want to be secure in their liberal beliefs, may not understand what is going on. But every other Indian knows precisely what is happening: deep down he knows that a larger response is emerging even if at times this response appears in his eyes to be threatening.

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Secularism Thy TRUE FACE - 'JAICHANDISM'

29/11/2008 06:33:50 H. Balakrishnan
LETTER TO INDIAN EXPRESS
DEAR SIR,

This has reference to the edit " Facing terrorism with conviction ", " Prime time terrorism". - (TNIE - 28 NOV), and " Will we go to war with Pak " - (TNIE - 29 NOV).

An honest confession to begin with. The ' tone and tenor ' of all the ' THREE ' was anticipated, and, sorry to say, the element of 'surprise' which the Jihadis acheived in Mumbai was not there. Just goes to show how damned predictable the mumbo-jumbos of the Macaulayites have become!! But I digress.

Lets take the edit for starters. Apart from the fact (on expected lines!!) that there is not a single word to indicate 'Jihadis' or 'Muslims' as to the identity of the terrorists, you compund the felony by writing: " One can only wonder at the minds that can deliberately plan and then carry out such operations, at the rage and hatred that permeates their faculties, at the reasoning that rejoices at the infliction of such suffering, that see fulfilment of life's purpose in this trauma". In a word, COWARDICE writ large in such maudlin writings. And yet, your paper has NO compunctions in headlining: " Hindu terrorism has begun to sprout " - (TNIE- 26 Oct). Anything further need be told about your 'secular HYPOCRICY'?

Here's why those 'Green Believers' do what they do.

" Fight against them (Mushriks) until idolatry is no more, and Allah's religion reigns supreme" - (Q- 2:193,8:39 ); " Lay hold of him and bind him. Burn him in the fire of Hell"; " When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield stike off their heads and when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly" - (Q - 69:30-37); " Cast TERROR into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, maim them in every limb" - (Q - 8:12); " Fight and slay the PAGANS wherever you find them, and sieze them, beleagur them and lie in wait for them in every stratagem till they respect and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity" - (Q - 11:8). Just a few examples. There are MANY MORE that can be cited.

And the 'REWARD" for such "HOLY ACTIONS". The 'PARADISE" in the Holy Quaran provided ' Rest and passive enjoyment; verdant gardens watered by murmuring rivulets, wherein the 'believers' - - - repose (quaffing) aromatic wines such as the Arabs loved from goblets placed before them or handed round in silver cups resplendent as glass by beautiful youths - - Verily! for the pious is a blissful abode; Gardens and Vineyards, and damsels with swelling bosoms, of equal age, and a full cup - -" These damsels of Paradise are introduced as 'Lovely large-eyed girls resembling pearls hidden in their shells, a reward for that which the faithfuls have wrought - - Verily! we have created them (the houries) of a rare creation; we have made them virgins, fascinating, of an equal age'.(REF: 'LIFE OF MOHAMET' - William Muir - pp:74,75 - as quoted in Prof. K.s. Lal's " Theory and Practice of Muslim State in India " - pp: 54-55)

Hopefully, that should answer the 'unbelieving' question posed by your 'secular' edit writers!!

The next stupidity of the edit writers: " Whether Mumbai's destroyers came from the same ranks - -is not yet known". At the time of writing the edit,or even before, the name "Ajmal" from Faridkot, Pakistan had already been carried across homes all over on 27Nov evening by the T.V. Channels!!And yet , ' identity ' not known!! SECULAR BULLSHIT - No more. No Less, please.

Lets now turn to the Sudarshan ' hogwash '. After 5 wasted columns of subsidised newsprint, I was left wondering what the writer was wanting to convey to the reader!! Mumabi, in a word, represents the failure of the Indian State to protect its citizens. We all know what the ATS had been engaged in the days preceding the attack, leaving the 'Gates of Troy - OPEN'. It is instructive to read Air Marshal (retd) S.Y. Savur's (former AOC-in-C, Southern Air Command) blog - "National Security Agency" , where he wrote: " Why do we read that the State Police was informed? Why don’t we read that the DGP/IGP Intelligence was dismissed for dereliction of duty in not ensuring not only that actionable intelligence was used to stop some terrorist attack? Why don’t we read that some SSP/SP was dismissed for not taking action against terrorists? So how come with all that massive budget, human and techint resources we are always two steps behind terrorists by any acronym (LeT, JeM, IM, HUJI and now that one in Malegaon, whose acronym I forgot)? "

Thats what is expected from the likes of Sudarshan - but they fail abysmally. Dhimmitude is their calling card.

( http://sysavur.blogspot.com/2008/11/national-security-agency.html )

And now to the Aditya Sinha ' Saturday Special '. It is obvious that he is afflicted with chronic ' Stockholm Sydrome 'vis-a-vis Pakistan.I suppose the traumatic events of yesteryears as evidenced by this -" Pakistan expells Indian Journalist" - has caused this Syndrome?
URL: ( http://www.thehoot.org/web/home/searchdetail.php?sid=309&bg=1 ).
Hence 'mediation with Pakistan' is passe. Help Pakistan financially to help that country tide over its present financial difficulties is equally passe. And then the ridiculous thesis - 'A failed Pakistan is NOT in India's interest'. The fact of the matter - Pakistan WAS A FAILED STATE FROM 14 AUG 1947 onwards. NOT FOR OUR 'SECULARS', OF COURSE!!

Historian Ba't Yeor has researched into this trait of 'Dhimmitude' and wrote: " Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, " protected people ", are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they " feel themselves subdued " (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, is part of the law that global jihadists are laboring to impose everywhere, ultimately on the entire human race."

" The dhimmi attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today."

All the three referred TNIE pieces are best described in the words of Shri Vishal Agarwal,a California based NRI and an intellectual: " How come Muslims alienate themselves in every society? Secularists ask us to understand Muslims, but when will Muslims understand non-Muslims? Are 1400 years not enough? By constantly raising the issues of Gujarat riots and Babri demolitions, these 'secular intellectuals' behave like 'fanatical mullahs without beards', because they serve the same purpose as the mullahs with beards - which is to incite Muslims to continue waging 'revenge' upon infidels, just as they have been doing for 1400 years.

The statement of Indian Muslim Council does not condemn the violence unequivocally and does not fail to make a note of the 'harassment of minorities in India". What about the harassment of infidels in Islam? When will Muslims start taking responsibility for what their co-religionists are doing, instead of just blaming others everytime. To an infidel like me, there seems to be something sinister in this blame game strategy.

The dozens of the 1-2 member 'secularist' organizations of Indians in America such as RAHI, SAHI, FOSA etc., (and those in India such as ANHAD, SAHMAT) will, just for the sake of official record, issue placid, hackneyed, insipid press releases to 'condemn' the Mumbai Islamic terror attacks.

These statements will mirror what the Indian Muslim Council said in its own. And before long, these secular orgs will be back to their usual business- browbeat the Gujarat and Babri issues and incite even more Muslims to continue with their terrorist attacks. In my opinion, the Teesta Setalvads, NDTVs and so on have the blood of innocent Islamic terror victims on their hands.

Ironically, the ATS chief Karkare who harrassed the Hindu Sadhvi and might have been instrumental in giving the selective leaks about 'Hindu Terror' to the ' mullah without beard' secularist media types became one of the first victims of the latest Islamic terror - the real terror from which he was deflecting attention."

And as to Aditya Sinha's 'red herring' of 'Gujaratis' - the names of thos destined for the "Special Paradise with the 72 Vestal Virgins" ARE OUT SIR!! - Ajmal has revealed the name of his fellow jihadis all Pakistani citizens as Abu Ali, Fahad, Omar, Shoaib, Umer, Abu Akasha, Ismail, Abdul Rahman (Bara) and Abdul Rahman (Chhota).

Over the next few days, here is what I anticipate the 'secular' TNIE to be coming out with:
(A) - Javed Anand writing that 'Islam has nothing to do with
Terror '
(B) - His wife, Teesta Setalvad, writing about the 'shadow of suspicion' pointing to Narendra Modi and by extension Sadhvi Pragya Tahur and a new 'unnamed Army Officer', for the Mumabi Terror!!

(C) - Seema Mustafa will come out with something similar and link the events in Orissa to Mumabi in a brilliant piece of Hercule Poirot like deduction!!
(D) - 'The Delphic Oracle' B.G. Verghese will present a 'Revised Estimate' of the Aid to be given to Pakistan in these troubled times, from $10 billion to a 'large-hearted' $100 billion, to prevent a repeat of Mumbai - that'll be his line.
(E) - A learned treatise from Aditya Sinha as the next Saturday Special on "Hindu Terror'!!

India has had a hoary history of 'Jaichands'.

Secularism Thy TRUE FACE - 'JAICHANDISM '.

Links to this post:

Create a Link

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home




Home | Syndicate this site (XML) | Guestbook | Blogger
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors.
Everything else © 2005 Pseudo-Secularism